FACTS:
The chief issue raised by the petitioners in
this case is whether or not Section 143 of the Local Government Code1granting
power to the municipal mayor to conduct preliminary investigations and order
the arrest of the accused, was repealed by the 1985 Rules on Criminal Procedure
promulgated by this Court; and is, in addition, unconstitutional as vesting the
power to conduct preliminary investigations in an official who cannot be deemed
a "neutral and detached magistrate" within the contemplation
of Section 3, Article IV of the 1973 Constitution. The issue is hereby resolved
adversely to the petitioners, with the stressed qualification that the mayor's
power to order arrest ceased to exist as of February 2, 1987 when the new
Constitution was ratified by the Filipino people, and that, in any event, the
investigation actually conducted by respondent mayor in the case at bar was
fatally defective.
RULING:
While it is true that the mayors do
"exercise general supervision over units and elements of the INP stationed
or assigned in their respective jurisdictions," they are not themselves
directly involved in police work and cannot in any sense be described, as the
petitioners do, as being deeply involved in law enforcement functions. And even
if that "deep involvement" be conceded, it does not follow that this
would necessarily preclude their assuming "the cold neutrality of an
impartial judge" in conducting preliminary investigations of persons
suspected of crimes.
No comments:
Post a Comment