Ohhh Eym Gee..
"Change what you cannot accept and accept what you cannot change."
Friday, July 8, 2016
Ohhh Eym Gee..: A TALE OF A SHATTERED GIRL
Ohhh Eym Gee..: A TALE OF A SHATTERED GIRL: In love. Still in love with a guy whose heart does not contain my name anymore. Our love was a “hot and cold” love. It beca...
Wednesday, May 25, 2016
A TALE OF A SHATTERED GIRL
In love. Still in love with a guy whose heart does
not contain my name anymore.
Our love was a “hot and cold” love. It became hot when we
are in each other’s arms then cold when he’s far away. We live in a same town.
I knew him back when I was a high school student because I often saw him making
fun with his friends who are fortunately my acquaintances in our neighborhood. However, that time, I don’t have any feelings towards him. I don’t even know
his name. He is just a tall, skinny, and playful guy.
When I finished my secondary education, I decided to
pursue my college degree in Iloilo. I enjoyed my stay there and developed a
relationship that I thought would last for a lifetime with a marine guy. But
God never favored it and we ended our relationship after three years. I
thought I would not be able to recuperate my heart for a long time but.. surprise!, I became cheerful again after
two to three weeks.
It was mid-November 2010 when someone tried to converse
with me through Facebook. To my surprise, he was the same guy in our town. At
first, I don’t want to be his friend because he had the same course with my
recent “ex”. I tried to avoid him as much as possible until he stopped
communicating with me. I felt relief.
But..
He started contacting me after five months.
I really don’t want to talk with him! But he keeps on
insisting to have little talks with me until I decided to give him a chance.
After all, we’re of the same town and adding a new friend on my list is not
actually a bad idea. It started with small talks over the phone (because he is
studying in Davao that time and I am also preparing myself to enter law school)
until it became a routine of 11pm to 6am. Would you believe that? Haha.. But it’s
true. We never talked about love, commitments, and courtship. It’s anything
under the heat of the sun. I really saw him as my smart friend.
Until, he started opening his heart to me. He told me
that, unexpectedly, he fell in love with me. I was speechless. I was verbally
constipated. Haha.. But, I don’t have feelings for him! I don’t want to lose a
special friend. He matters. He courted me for two years. He patiently waited
for me for a long time. But that two years was my chance to see his other side.
He is so thoughtful. He never failed to contact me when he got a chance. At
that time, he was completing his “On the Job Training” in a how many nautical
miles. I never met him in person for that whole two years but was able to meet
his family.
Until
the day comes when we met for my panel interview where I was accepted as a law
student..
I
said, yes!
I
fall in love with a marine guy.. AGAIN.
Things
became hotter and happier. I felt love and care.
Until
he came back from his school to finish his studies..
Things
became colder and sadder. I felt hate and neglect.
Things
became different. He rarely talks with me. Reasons were he was busy or tired or
sleepy then next thing I know, he became a different person. I don’t know him
anymore. Gone is the guy I talked with a couple of hours until the rooster
crows in the morning. Gone is the guy who took great effort to make me smile.
At first, I became a fool. I am blinded by love. I made efforts to salvage our
love. But it’s hopeless when the other party does not appreciate your effort. I
never thought our love became messy. I was contented and confident that our
love has a strong foundation. Or so I thought. It became a one-sided love
affair.
After
27 months, I decided to let him go. I realized that I am a girl who doesn’t deserve
being an OPTION. It hurts! People said that it is more hurtful when a person
you love broke up with you. But why does it feel so wrong? I let him go. I
broke up with him! But why am I that person who feels this excruciating pain? I’ve
been hurting myself for two years already. In fact, I’ve been hurting since the
day I felt his love starting to fade. I love him so much that I let him go
because he is not happy with me anymore. I can feel it. Every. Single. Day.
I
decided to divert my attention to many activities. I tried everything so that I
could forget him even for a moment. I have been asking God for help. To stop
this madness. To stop this pain. I became dependent with God because I know He
is my Great Comforter but why does my mind comes to our memories?
You
know what’s the most crucial part of being in silence? That’s when I saw him
crying before we broke up. Why did he even bother to cry? I let him go. He should
be happy! Footspa naman o! What’s his
reason for crying? Is it because he betrayed me? Is it because he can’t let me
go but he had to for he doesn’t want to see me hurt anymore? Or am I that one
who hurt him? Or am I that one who doesn’t understand him? There are so many
questions that still linger in my head. I always end up thinking why he cried
that day before he said that he loves me but he had to let me go, too. I still
remember that last kiss he gave me, those tears he shed for me, those pain in
his eyes, those hugs that trembles and unsure, and those fake smiles that gave
me hint that he already left me a long time ago..
But,
I f*cking love him so much. So damn much that I don’t want to see him anymore!
I
am hurting but he is smiling.
I
am struggling but he is still smiling.
I
was the reason behind his smiles before until he can only force his smiles.
Then, later on, I am not the one who could make him smile anymore.
I
wish he knows how I can still manage to survive here after he broke me into
pieces. I wish he sees what he did to me. I wish he did not approach me when in
the end, he just left me.
God
knows I’ve done so hard to forget him but he never left my system. Fool.
Stupid. Weak. Helpless. Shattered.
Too.
Much. Pain.
Someone,
save me. Please.
Sunday, February 7, 2016
CIVIL PROCEDURE: DBP VS. CASTILLO (Jurisprudence)
G.R. No. 163827 August 17, 2011
MEANING OF CAUSE OF ACTION
A cause of action is the act or omission by which a party violates a right of another. A complaint states a cause of action when it contains three (3) essential elements: (a) a right in favor of the plaintiff by whatever means and whatever law it arises; (b) the correlative obligation of the defendant to respect such right; and (c) the act or omission of the defendant violates the right of the plaintiff.
If any of these elements is absent, the complaint becomes vulnerable to a motion to dismiss on the ground of failure to state a cause of action.
MEANING OF CAUSE OF ACTION
A cause of action is the act or omission by which a party violates a right of another. A complaint states a cause of action when it contains three (3) essential elements: (a) a right in favor of the plaintiff by whatever means and whatever law it arises; (b) the correlative obligation of the defendant to respect such right; and (c) the act or omission of the defendant violates the right of the plaintiff.
If any of these elements is absent, the complaint becomes vulnerable to a motion to dismiss on the ground of failure to state a cause of action.
CIVIL PROCEDURE: REPUBLIC VS. BANTIGUE POINT (Jurisprudence)
G.R. No. 162322 March 14, 2012
OBJECTIONS TO JURISDICTION OVER THE SUBJECT MATTER
The rule is settled that lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter may be raised at any stage of the proceedings. Jurisdiction over the subject matter is conferred only by the Constitution or the law. It cannot be acquired through a waiver or enlarged by the omission of the parties or conferred by the acquiescence of the court. Consequently, questions of jurisdiction may be cognizable even if raised for the first time on appeal.
CIVIL PROCEDURE: BARITUA VS MERCADER (Jurisprudence)
G.R. No. 136048 January 23, 2001
DOCTRINE OF ADHERENCE OF JURISDICTION
Generally. the jurisdiction of a court is determined by the statute in force at the commencement of the action, unless such statute provides for its retroactive application. Once the jurisdiction of a court attaches, it continues until the case is finally terminated. The trial court cannot be ousted therefrom by subsequent happenings or events, although of a character that would have prevented jurisdiction from attaching in the first instance.
DOCTRINE OF ADHERENCE OF JURISDICTION
Generally. the jurisdiction of a court is determined by the statute in force at the commencement of the action, unless such statute provides for its retroactive application. Once the jurisdiction of a court attaches, it continues until the case is finally terminated. The trial court cannot be ousted therefrom by subsequent happenings or events, although of a character that would have prevented jurisdiction from attaching in the first instance.
CIVIL PROCEDURE: BAGUNU VS. AGGABAO (Jurisprudence)
G.R. No. 186487 August 15, 2011
DOCTRINE OF PRIMARY JURISDICTION
Under this doctrine, courts must refrain from determining a controversy involving a question which is within the jurisdiction of the administrative discretion requiring the special knowledge, experience and services of the administrative tribunal to determine technical and intricate matters of fact.
DOCTRINE OF PRIMARY JURISDICTION
Under this doctrine, courts must refrain from determining a controversy involving a question which is within the jurisdiction of the administrative discretion requiring the special knowledge, experience and services of the administrative tribunal to determine technical and intricate matters of fact.
CIVIL PROCEDURE: REPUBLIC VS ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF MANILA (Jurisprudence)
G.R. No. 192975 November 12, 2012
HOW JURISDICTION IS CONFERRED AND DETERMINED
It is axiomatic that the nature of an action and whether the tribunal has jurisdiction over such action are to be determined from the material allegations of the complaint, the law in force at the time the complaint is filed, and the character of the relief sought irrespective of whether the plaintiff is entitled to all or some of the claims averred. Jurisdiction is not affected by the pleas or the theories set up by defendant in an answer to the complaint or a motion to dismiss the same.
HOW JURISDICTION IS CONFERRED AND DETERMINED
It is axiomatic that the nature of an action and whether the tribunal has jurisdiction over such action are to be determined from the material allegations of the complaint, the law in force at the time the complaint is filed, and the character of the relief sought irrespective of whether the plaintiff is entitled to all or some of the claims averred. Jurisdiction is not affected by the pleas or the theories set up by defendant in an answer to the complaint or a motion to dismiss the same.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)